Analysis How lawful are the USA’s military options against North Korea?Washington's legal basis for a pre-emptive strike would likely be controversial among UN member states Unless taken in self-defense (and even then for only a limited period of time), the UN Charter forbids all use of force taken without the approval of the Security Council. But the meaning of this self-defense exception is disputed. Most countries read self-defence as lawful only in response to an attack. But some countries argue it can be lawful against imminent attacks. And very few – notably the U.S. – argue it may be used even against anticipated attacks. The consequence is that some of Tillerson’s “military options” against the DPRK would be accepted as lawful by the international © Korea Risk Group. All rights reserved. |